Should Floggin Be Brought Back Essays

Should Floggin Be Brought Back Essays Should Floggin Be Brought Back Essay Should Floggin Be Brought Back Essay Essay Topic: Op Ed Carmencita Gonzalez Professor Orzeck, Ph. D. English 102. 051 October 28, 2011 Should Flogging Be brought Back? Jeff Jacoby a columnist for the Boston Globe published an essay â€Å"Bring Back Flogging†, on the op-ed page on February 20, 1997. Jacoby states that flogging people is better than â€Å"Locking them up in cages. † (para. 4) He goes on to say that flogging will teach people moral and educational values, while â€Å"Prison is a graduate school of criminal studies. † (para. ) In the seventeenth century flogging was very famous among the Boston’s Puritans it was a punishment for people that were convicted of blasphemy, adultery, and other thing they felt was immortal and illegal. Jacoby then implement that being incarcerated is much more dangerous than being whipped because the violence in prison is outrageous, for example, rape, beatings, and murders. Nevertheless, Jacoby made some ridiculous statements in his article â€Å"Bring Back Floggingâ⠂¬  is filled of fallacy. First, Jacoby incorrectly states that â€Å"Imprisonment has become our penalty of choice for every offense in the criminal code† (para. 5) for violence and nonviolent crimes, on the other hand, Jacoby really need to take a course in criminal justice before he supplies invalid information. Imprisonment is base on the type the amount and type of crime someone commits.. For example, if a person commits a nonviolent crime like retail theft or protesting illegally then they are charge with a misdemeanor and are order to complete some type of community service or just pay a fine. On the contrary, in the seventeenth century if you were caught stealing they would probably cut your hand off and if you were could protesting they would probably whip you in front of the whole community. Does Jacoby every stop to think about how these people were probably traumatized emotional and physical? Then, Jacoby goes on to say how expensive it is to maintain these prisoners. He also claims that by locking them up we are teach them a lesson, in fact, it only makes them more cruel and savvy than when they first arrive In addition he said that â€Å" There is a certain cachet to doing time a stint in prison becomes a sign of manhood. (para. 8) Jacoby never stop to think about the inmate that learn their lesson and use their time to become educated and never come back. Yes it might cost tax payer a lot of money to keep these criminals locked up, but I rather pay whatever it cost to make sure I feel safe from real criminal that are locked up. Meanwhile back in the seventeenth ce ntury rapist and child molester where whipped and set free back into the community; furthermore, who would feel safe know that these people where just given a slap on the wrist and set free. Moreover, I strongly disagree with him stating that flogging young offender would teach them a lesson. Come on! Does this author realizes that in today society young offender are probably use to being beaten. Young people are beat in different ways and by different people for example, parents, sibling and bullies. There is a meth that young people adapt to beating or whips. Not only that it is proven that when a child or young person is constantly beat or whip they become more violent. Incredibly, what really drove me insane was when Jacoby state there are many prisoners that are at high risk for being beaten, rape, and murdered while incarcerated. I deeply disagree with that statement because he did not support us with accurate information on that topic. Flogging endangers the health of a human being, in addition, if flogging was brought back in today society beating and whipping would no longer intimidate anyone it would be punishment in itself Prison staff would take it upon themselves to illegal beat or whip prisoner. Government would also be involved. This is in human and we cannot allow this. Jeff Jacoby tries to discover the best way to punish law-breakers, but unfortunately, through too many false assumptions and incorrect theories, he fails. He fails to see the real value of imprisonment, the truth behind brutal and inhumane punishment, and the simple reality that violence only breeds further violence. In order to diminish crime and aggression in our society, government cannot use punishment that is in itself an example of brutality, but needs to take humane and reasonable steps in prevention and retribution of crime.